global warming hoax

Author Post
Denny
Mon Nov 23 2009, 10:16AM

Registered Member #140
Joined: Wed May 14 2008, 03:38AM
Posts: 895
As this story unfolds, I'm amazed by a lot of people stating, "How can this be? This can't be true! Well, it sure looks that way and I'm not surprised that this went on because of the "ETHICS" of the Alarmist crowd. They will say and do "anything" to put any information in "Their" direction whether it is accurate or not...but mainly NOT! Now it's time to put this Climate Change issue to rest and shove this in the Alarmist face. Enough is enough...CO2 isn't our enemy and there's proof on this and now there's proof on how AGW Scientists handled their so called Peer Reviewed Papers. [quote] Oh, we can't let this person view and judge this because he will not "agree" with it and put an end to this article..[Unquote] We have to get rid of him...Is this SCIENCE at work??? Just because of the "Complexities" of Climate Change, to which the Alarmist KNEW they were wrong, tried to benefit the figuires to continue THEIR cause..

One thing I've been told about Life is "Life is Nothing But a Circle, What You Put Into it, Thats what you get BACK"!

Regards,
Denny

Climate researchers at the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit may have intentionally and artificially skewed temperature data in studies

The field of global warming is a fascinating facet of atmospheric science. Unfortunately, few are approaching the topic from an unbiased perspective -- the majority is dead set on proving it, while other are equally passionate about disproving it, or at least removing the implication that man may play a role in global warming. Both sides have been found to falsify data, withhold information, or otherwise distort views on the topic, reportedly. Notably internal investigations found that the Bush administration worked to silence climatologists at NASA who published pro-warming papers. Likewise, James Hansen, the leading climate scientist at NASA, was found to be engaging in an equally deceptive game of altering temperature data to make warming look more serious than it was.

Now a stunning new example of biased science and policy has come to light. The University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, one of the UK's top climate research centers, has been hacked by an unknown party, who release an archive of the emails and data from the center, which can be viewed here. The emails in the archive contain evidence of misconduct, casting climate research done at the center in a new light.

A spokesperson for the center confirmed the breach, stating to BBC News, "We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites. Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine. This information has been obtained and published without our permission and we took immediate action to remove the server in question from operation. We are undertaking a thorough internal investigation and we have involved the police in this enquiry."

Some of the emails seem merely cruel, but do not indicate misconduct. For example CRU director Phil Jones cheers the death of leading climate skeptic John Daly stating, "In an odd way this is cheering news." In another email he fantasizes about physically assaulting a climate skeptic, stating, "Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted."